Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1185

reference
17-tree-1
name
1185
tree-preservation-order

undefined

17-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.016614 50.879621)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.016557 50.879615,-1.016559 50.879626,-1.016567 50.879636,-1.016580 50.879644,-1.016595 50.879649,-1.016613 50.879651,-1.016630 50.879649,-1.016646 50.879644,-1.016659 50.879637,-1.016667 50.879627,-1.016670 50.879616,-1.016668 50.879604,-1.016660 50.879594,-1.016648 50.879586,-1.016632 50.879581,-1.016614 50.879579,-1.016597 50.879581,-1.016581 50.879586,-1.016568 50.879594,-1.016560 50.879603,-1.016557 50.879615)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL